Optimizing Sensor Data Interpretation via Hybrid Parametric Bootstrapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) site in Ontario, Canada, has long been a hub for nuclear research, which has resulted in the accumulation of legacy nuclear waste, including radioactive materials such as uranium, plutonium, and other radionuclides. Effective management of this legacy requires precise contamination and risk assessments, with a particular focus on the concentration levels of fissile materials such as U235. These assessments are essential for maintaining nuclear criticality safety. This study estimates the upper bounds of U235 concentrations. We investigated the use of a hybrid parametric bootstrapping method and robust statistical techniques to analyze datasets with outliers, then compared these outcomes with those derived from nonparametric bootstrapping. This study underscores the significance of measuring U235 for ensuring safety, conducting environmental monitoring, and adhering to regulatory compliance requirements at nuclear legacy sites. We used publicly accessible U235 data from the Eastern Desert of Egypt to demonstrate the application of these statistical methods to small datasets, providing reliable upper limit estimates that are vital for remediation and decommissioning efforts. This method seeks to enhance the interpretation of sensor data, ultimately supporting safer nuclear waste management practices at legacy sites such as CRL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".