MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407591355 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-90070-8

A versatile and efficient method to isolate nuclei from low-input cryopreserved tissues for single-nuclei transcriptomics

2025· article· en· W4407591355 on OpenAlexafffund
Cristopher Segovia, Vincent Desrosiers, Fatemeh Khadangi, Karine Robitaille, Victoria Saavedra Armero, Myreille D’Astous, Gabriel Khelifi, Alain Bergeron, Samer M. I. Hussein, Maxime Richer, Yohan Bossé, Yves Fradet, Vincent Fradet, Steve Bilodeau

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecHôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité Laval
KeywordsCryopreservationTranscriptomeComputer scienceComputational biologyCell biologyBiologyGeneGeneticsGene expressionEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical samples are vital for understanding diseases, but their scarcity requires refined research methods. Emerging single-cell technologies offer detailed views of tissue heterogeneity but need sufficient fully characterized tissues. We developed an optimized single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) protocol to extract nuclei from just 15 mg of cryopreserved human tissue. Applied to four cancer tissues (brain, bladder, lung, prostate), it profiled 1550-7468 nuclei per tissue, revealing heterogeneity comparable to public single-cell atlases. This method enhances the use and sharing of rare, cryopreserved biospecimens, supporting research where sample quantity is limited and full tissue characterization is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207