MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407592983

[A Case of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Associated with Transverse Colon Cancer].

2024· article· en· W4407592983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hidekazu Hiramoto, Yasunobu Araki, Ryoji Koshiba, Naoto Shimeno, Hiroshi Nishi

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransverse colonTransverse planeColorectal cancerCancerMedicineInternal medicineRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 86-year-old man with a 3 months history of weight loss and bloody diarrhea was admitted to our hospital. Endoscopic examination revealed transverse colon cancer, along with numerous polypoid lesions in the stomach, duodenum, colon, and rectum. These findings led to a diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome(CCS). Due to advanced colon cancer with stenosis, the patient underwent laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy of the colon with D3 lymphadenectomy. The patient had no major postoperative complications and was discharged on the 17th postoperative day. Six weeks after surgery, the patient was treated with steroids, which led to an improvement in his symptoms. However, after the steroid dose was reduced, diarrhea worsened and the patient continued to receive treatment. The typical treatment for CSS is medical use of corticosteroids, but there is a timing issue regarding when to perform surgery on a patient with cancer. In this case, we could perform surgery for CCS with advanced colon cancer and safely introduce steroid therapy early after surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→