Trends in the Management of Oligodendrogliomas: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Oligodendrogliomas present challenges in management despite their favorable prognosis. Optimal therapeutic strategies are not well-established. We aimed to characterize current practice patterns and identify areas of discordance in oligodendroglioma management. METHODS: A 20-question survey was distributed February-July 2023 to 4 professional neurosurgery/neuro-oncology societies to assess practices in oligodendroglioma management. The survey collected data on demographics, diagnostic practices, and treatment decisions. Data analysis was performed using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Sixty-three physicians responded, representing 12 countries. Diagnostic practices were consistent among respondents. However, variations in management recommendations were observed. Providers were divided between rarely (36.5%), sometimes (25.4%), and often (30.2%) using temozolomide (TMZ) as sole chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma. For patients with subtotal resection of grade 2 oligodendroglioma, 33.3% of providers recommended upfront radiation/chemotherapy, 27.0% recommended observation, and the remaining 39.7% were divided among options including surgery, chemotherapy, and clinical trials. European providers more frequently recommended surgery (33.3% vs. 0.0%), whereas radiation/chemotherapy (35.7% vs. 26.7%) or observation (31.0% vs. 13.3%) was more commonly recommended by U.S./Canada providers (P = 0.009). Providers also disagreed on adjuvant therapy for grade 3 oligodendroglioma. 47.6% recommended radiation/procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine, and 33.3% recommended radiation/TMZ. This decision varied by region, with European providers more frequently recommending radiation/procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (86.7% vs. 33.3%) and U.S./Canadian providers more frequently recommending radiation/TMZ (40.5% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the complexity of oligodendroglioma management and the importance of ongoing research to refine therapeutic strategies. Further studies, especially with the introduction of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in practice, are warranted to track practice patterns and reassess recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".