MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407593594 · doi:10.25259/jcas_67_2024

Surgical Innovation: Ultrasound gel – A dermal filler training tool for young injectors

2025· article· en· W4407593594 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Kanumuru, Aniketh Venkataram, Sukhbir S. Singh, Venkataram Mysore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFiller (materials)UltrasoundInjectorRadiologyComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dermal fillers have gained increased popularity as a nonsurgical esthetic procedure over the past few years. The learning curve in injectables is very steep and needs a lot of practice. Young injectors get trained in dermal filler injection techniques at various workshops through observation courses or through cadaveric studies. However, due to the high cost of the filler injections, it has been very difficult for young trainees to afford hands-on injectable training courses. We describe an alternative to the expensive hyaluronic acid fillers as a training tool for young injectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic SurgerySame topicFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207