Multi-tissue metabolomics reveal mtDNA- and diet-specific metabolite profiles in a mouse model of cardiometabolic disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Excess consumption of sugar- and fat-rich foods has heightened the prevalence of cardiometabolic disease, which remains a driver of cardiovascular disease- and type II diabetes-related mortality globally. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is an early feature of cardiometabolic disease and is a precursor to diabetes. Insulin resistance risk varies with self-reported race, whereby African-Americans have a greater risk of diabetes development relative to their White counterparts. Self-reported race is strongly associated with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups, and previous reports have noted marked differences in bioenergetic and metabolic parameters in cells belonging to distinct mtDNA haplogroups, but the mechanism of these associations remains unknown. Additionally, distinguishing nuclear DNA (nDNA) and mtDNA contributions to cardiometabolic disease remains challenging in humans. The Mitochondrial-Nuclear eXchange (MNX) mouse model enables in vivo preclinical investigation of the role of mtDNA in cardiometabolic disease development, and has been implemented in studies of insulin resistance, fatty liver disease, and obesity in previous reports. METHODS: MNX mice, were fed sucrose-matched high-fat (45% kcal fat) or control diet (10% kcal fat) until 12 weeks of age (n = 5/group). Mice were weighed weekly and total body fat was collected at euthanasia. Gastrocnemius skeletal muscle and plasma metabolomes were characterized using untargeted dual-chromatography mass spectrometry; both hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and C18 columns were used, in positive- and negative-ion modes, respectively. RESULTS: was associated with branched chain amino acid metabolite co-expression. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal novel nDNA-mtDNA interactions that drive significant changes in metabolite levels. Alterations to key metabolites involved in mitochondrial bioenergetic dysfunction and electron transport chain activity are implicated in elevated beta-oxidation during high-fat diet feeding; abnormally elevated rates of beta-oxidation may be a key driver of insulin resistance. The results reported here support the hypothesis that mtDNA influences cardiometabolic disease-susceptibility by modulating mitochondrial function and metabolic pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".