MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407597404 · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132872

Introducing time series features based dynamic weights estimation framework for hydrologic forecast merging

2025· article· en· W4407597404 on OpenAlexafffund
Md Rasel Sheikh, Paulin Coulibaly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and HealthMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Hydrological modellingEstimationTime seriesComputer scienceMeteorologyHydrology (agriculture)Data miningGeologyClimatologyMachine learningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Time series features (TSFs) based weights (TSF-Ws) estimation framework is proposed for hydrologic forecast merging. • TSF-Ws significantly improve forecast accuracy, especially for longer lead times. • TSF-Ws-based merging shows better accuracy skills for high and low flow. • The TSF-Ws approach reduces the uncertainty bound for peak flow predictions. Accurate and reliable hydrologic forecasting through multi-model ensemble averaging is crucial for reducing uncertainty, which aids in effective water resources management and flood risk mitigation. This study addresses the research gap of the limited application of time-varying weights in hydrologic forecast merging, as existing methods rely on weights that do not adapt to changes in model performance over time. We propose a novel framework utilizing time series features (TSFs) of daily streamflow and Bayesian model averaging (BMA) to dynamically adjust merging weights, referred to as TSF-Ws. The methodology involves generating ensemble forecasts, adjusting weights dynamically using TSFs, and comparing the accuracy of these forecasts with traditional streamflow-based weights, referred to as Q-Ws, merging across different forecast horizons. The results demonstrate that TSF-Ws significantly improve forecast performance, particularly for longer lead times, indicating more accurate and reliable deterministic and probabilistic forecasts. Moreover, TSF-Ws based merging achieves higher performance than Q-Ws for deterministic high and low flow forecasts. Furthermore, this newly developed approach reduces the uncertainty bound for probabilistic peak flow predictions. Overall, the proposed TSF-Ws estimation framework can serve as a robust tool for enhancing hydrologic forecast merging, providing significant improvements in accuracy and reliability over traditional methods. These improvements have important implications for water resource management and flood risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HydrologySame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207