Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the colonial educational structure is fundamental to analyzing contemporary Western societies, as the consequences of these policies continue to shape educational and social structures both in former colonies and in former colonial metropolises. Although colonialism belongs to the distant past, the educational frameworks established during that era still perpetuate social inequalities and limit opportunities for social mobility. A review of modern educational policies in former colonies reveals how education remains oriented toward serving the interests of Western economies and sustaining social reproduction, thereby maintaining structural dependence and social stratification. At the same time, recognizing cultural identity through education, by incorporating local languages and cultural elements, constitutes a key objective in these countries. However, the dominance of international languages and the ongoing reliance on Western educational practices continue to pose challenges. This article employs a methodology that combines historical and comparative analysis of educational policies in the colonial and postcolonial periods. The methodology involves assessing the impact of colonial educational structures on contemporary societies, with a particular focus on the persistence of social inequality and structural dependencies, as well as examining efforts to redefine cultural identity through education. A comparative analysis of educational systems in former colonies provides concrete examples of colonialism’s enduring influences. Furthermore, references to migration and multiculturalism, particularly in former colonial metropolises, enhance the understanding of new challenges faced by societies in the era of globalization. Finally, the article highlights the necessity of educational policies that address social inequalities and promote equity, emphasizing the empowerment of local communities and the development of educational systems that foster social justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".