Topological identification and interpretation for single-cell epigenetic regulation elucidation in multi-tasks using scAGDE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-cell ATAC-seq technology advances our understanding of single-cell heterogeneity in gene regulation by enabling exploration of epigenetic landscapes and regulatory elements. However, low sequencing depth per cell leads to data sparsity and high dimensionality, limiting the characterization of gene regulatory elements. Here, we develop scAGDE, a single-cell chromatin accessibility model-based deep graph representation learning method that simultaneously learns representation and clustering through explicit modeling of data generation. Our evaluations demonstrated that scAGDE outperforms existing methods in cell segregation, key marker identification, and visualization across diverse datasets while mitigating dropout events and unveiling hidden chromatin-accessible regions. We find that scAGDE preferentially identifies enhancer-like regions and elucidates complex regulatory landscapes, pinpointing putative enhancers regulating the constitutive expression of CTLA4 and the transcriptional dynamics of CD8A in immune cells. When applied to human brain tissue, scAGDE successfully annotated cis-regulatory element-specified cell types and revealed functional diversity and regulatory mechanisms of glutamatergic neurons. Single-cell ATAC-seq reveals gene regulation at individual cell levels but struggles with data sparsity. Here, authors introduce scAGDE, a deep graph learning framework that improves cell embedding and clustering, outperforming existing methods and uncovering key regulatory mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".