MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407605853 · doi:10.70266/9783886177349

10.70266/9783886177349

2000· book· en· W4407605853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ein schon längst überfälliges Thema: Mindestens die Hälfte der Schüler(innen) der Förderschulen mit dem Schwerpunkt geistige Entwicklung zeigt Verhaltensauffälligkeiten, Problemverhalten und psychische Störungen. Das subjektive Leiden der Kinder, die Belastungen der Familien, der Betreuungs- und Lehrpersonen sowie die damit verbundene Beeinträchtigung der sozialen Teilhabe und der Inklusionschancen gehören zu den schwerwiegenden Folgen. Dieses Buch stellt Wissen und Informationen über Handlungsmöglichkeiten bereit. Es gibt in fundierten Beiträgen aus unterschiedlichen Fachgebieten, aus der Medizin, der Pädagogik, der Psychologie und auf der Grundlage der Erfahrungen von Therapeut(inn)en, Schulleitungen u. a. m. Antworten auf die Fragen: • Wie groß ist das Problem und wie gehen Lehrer(innen) damit um? • Welche Struktur und Qualität hat die psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Versorgung geistig behinderter Schüler mit zusätzlichen Verhaltensauffälligkeiten? • Welche Interventionen sind in der Schule möglich und sinnvoll?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9920.978

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it