AI-driven grain storage solutions: Exploring current technologies, applications, and future trends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies is revolutionizing the food grain industry, particularly in the storage and quality management. This work provides a comprehensive review on the integration of AI and ML in the food grain industry, focusing on current technologies, applications, and future advancements. Various AI technologies including artificial neural networks (ANNs), fuzzy logic systems , and ML methods such as deep learning , supervised learning, and anomaly detection have been discussed. The practical applications of these technologies in addressing critical areas such as pest and insect damage detection, grain classification, crop disease detection, mycotoxin contamination, and supply chain management are highlighted. Applications of innovative technological approaches, including edge computing, digital twins, Internet of Things (IoT), and blockchain , have been discussed for their impact on enhancing grain storage quality management. The review also critically examines the challenges and limitations associated with AI and ML, such as data privacy, inaccuracies, and regulatory concerns. In addition, the emerging trends that are set to revolutionize grain quality management such as smart sensors , robotics, remote sensing , and augmented reality are discussed. By synthesizing current knowledge and future prospects, this review aims to provide a holistic understanding of AI's transformative potential in the grain industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".