MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407607389 · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2025.103969

Iodine reduction and retention of nutrients and flavour-active compounds upon warm seawater treatment of the kelps Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima

2025· article· en· W4407607389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgal Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges ForskningsrådRéseau de cancérologie RossyMøre og Romsdal Fylkeskommune
KeywordsNutrientSeawaterChemistryBotanyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commercially cultivated kelp (seaweed) species represent a potential dietary source of iodine but may also put consumers at risk of excessive intakes upon frequent consumption. This study investigated warm seawater (W-SW) treatment as a simple method for reducing the iodine content of Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima . Iodine concentrations decreased in both kelps upon W-SW exposure at 45 °C, i.e. by 38 % and 78 %, respectively, in A. esculenta and S. latissima after 1 min and 51 % and 88 % after 2 min. Longer treatments resulted in further decrease in A. esculenta whereas only marginal further reduction in iodine concentrations were achieved in S. latissima . No reduction in iodine concentration was measured in S. latissima following treatment at 35 °C (not tested for A. esculenta ). W-SW treatment at 45 °C induced loss of biomass in both kelps although the total retention was notably higher in A. esculenta compared to S. latissima . Among the analysed macronutrients, potassium and mannitol were associated with the lowest retentions. Losses of micronutrients (incl. vitamin B1 and B9) and trace elements were also measured in both kelps. The retention of free glutamate was high in both species suggesting that W-SW exposure does not negatively affect the umami potential of the final ingredients for food. Based on portions contributing 600 μg iodine, W-SW-treated A. esculenta was more nutritious than a comparable ingredient from S. latissima , with nutritionally relevant contribution (> 15 % of dietary reference intake (DRI)) per portion (4.6 g dry A. esculenta vs. 1.2 g S. latissima ) of sodium, and notable contributions (> 5 % of DRI) of other minerals (calcium, magnesium and potassium) and vitamin B9. Short W-SW treatment is a simple approach that could be implemented in commercial kelp production and contribute to reducing the risk of excessive dietary iodine exposure from seaweed consumption. • Warm seawater (W-SW) treatment at 45 °C reduced the iodine concentration of Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima but not at 35 °C. • 1–2 min W-SW treatment at 45 °C reduced the iodine concentration of both kelps and decreases the risk of excessive dietary iodine exposure. • Better nutrient retention was observed from W-SW exposure compared to reported results using similar treatments in fresh water • Better retention was seen in A. esculenta than in S. latissima . • If iodine concentrations limit the inclusion of kelp in food, A. esculenta represents a more nutritious alternative compared to S. latissima

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it