Enhancing Supply Chain Visibility and Resilience Through Information Systems Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the incorporation of information technology to improve visibility and resilience in supply networks. Amid increasing global complexity and volatility, enterprises must embrace innovative digital technology to maintain competitiveness and adaptability. This research utilizes qualitative methodologies, namely in-depth interviews with industry experts and practitioners, to investigate the impact of integrated information systems on supply chain performance. The results indicate that effective integration enhances operational efficiency and promotes real-time data exchange, allowing companies to make prompt, informed choices. The research identifies key themes, including the need of cooperation among supply chain partners, the disruptive effects of technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain, and the need to cultivate a culture of innovation and trust. Moreover, the study underscores the difficulties encountered in the deployment of these technologies, including financial implications and the need for qualified staff. The research highlights that leadership dedication and a conducive organizational culture are crucial for surmounting these hurdles and successfully harnessing digital change. This study enhances the comprehension of how integrated information systems may enhance supply chain resilience and visibility, providing significant insights for both practitioners and scholars. By underscoring the strategic significance of these systems, businesses may improve their capacity to address disruptions, maintain operational excellence, and attain sustainable development in a fluctuating business landscape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".