Leveraging Technology for Agile and Coordinated Responses to Supply Chain Disruptions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The global supply chain management environment has undergone considerable change, requiring a transition to more robust and flexible operating frameworks. This study examines the crucial influence of technology-facilitated agility and coordination on improving supply chain resilience, especially in light of current global difficulties. The research employs a thorough qualitative investigation of 30 supply chain specialists, revealing significant themes including technology integration, supplier engagement, effective risk management, and the impact of leadership on organizational culture. Research indicates that firms using new technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, and automation achieve enhanced operational efficiency and response to disturbances. Furthermore, cultivating robust supplier connections is essential for facilitating collaborative problem-solving and resource sharing, thereby improving overall supply chain agility. The report emphasizes the importance of proactive risk management practices that enable firms to recognize and successfully reduce possible hazards. Leadership is recognized as a pivotal element in fostering innovation and developing a flexible organizational culture, vital for managing the intricacies of contemporary supply chains. This study offers essential information for firms aiming to improve their resilience and responsiveness in a turbulent global context. By adopting these technology-driven concepts, firms may establish resilient supply chains that can prosper amid uncertainties and interruptions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".