Enhancing Sustainable Management of Waste Dump Sites with Smart Drones and Geospatial Tech
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air pollution poses a significant global health challenge, demanding access to precise and up-to-date air quality information for effective mitigation of its impact on human well-being. Traditional methods of monitoring air quality have limits in terms of efficiency and spatial coverage. However, monitoring systems for verifying the real-time air quality have emerged as a result of the integration of drone technology, Internet of Things, and Geographic Information System capabilities. These systems are especially useful in areas dealing with environmental challenges and health risks related to unsegregated waste because they provide accurate insights over large regions. In conclusion, GIS technology plays a critical role in the development and implementation of monitoring systems for real-time air quality checking, which are required to gain up-to-date, effective and accurate data that are critical for efficient environmental management and public health protection. Annual global air pollution poses a serious health risk to millions, underscoring the imperative for precise and current air quality information. The integration of IoT, drone, and GIS technologies enables dynamic real-time monitoring, unveiling fluctuations in gas concentrations. This emphasizes the vital significance of continual environmental surveillance, particularly in high-risk zones such as the Kodungaiyur dump yard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".