Planetary-scale heterotrophic microbial community modeling assesses metabolic synergy and viral impacts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The oceans buffer against climate change via biogeochemical cycles underpinned by microbial metabolic activities. While planetary-scale surveys provide baseline microbiome data, inferring metabolic and biogeochemical impacts remains challenging. Genome-scale modeling has addressed analogous issues at the cellular level, highlighting key metabolic reactions contingent upon specific ‘environmental’ conditions. Here we adapt this mechanistic modeling framework towards analyzing global ocean microbial communities to reveal metabolic processes predicted to maintain ecosystem functioning. To achieve this, we developed a genome-scale ‘superorganism’ metabolic model for each TARA Ocean metagenome or metatranscriptome (i.e., limited to reactions known from heterotrophic prokaryotes and viruses), and evaluated these models to establish a community-wide ‘metabolic phenotype’ for each sample. To validate, we showed that even with reaction-mappable genes only (∼1/4 of the total genes), model composition revealed metabolism-inferred ecological zones that matched taxonomy-inferred zones. Model inferred metabolic phenotypes revealed reaction cooperation associated with microbial metabolism and organism diversity. These phenotypes also suggest elevated ecological roles for viruses as model predictions suggest they genomically target community-critical metabolic reactions that underpin metabolic phenotype stability, and also demonstrate that, as metabolites are better understood, immediate estimates could be made for where viruses remineralize versus sink carbon. While this new constraints-based, agile, and mechanistic modeling framework is highly upgradable, it already begins to convert molecular-scale environmental omics data to ecological and even planetary-scale biogeochemical features that will better bring microbes and their viruses into Earth system and climate models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".