MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407618719 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.013

Physician's global assessment of disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: consensus-based recommendations from an international task force

2025· article· en· W4407618719 on OpenAlexaff
Veronika Rypdal, Hermine I. Brunner, Brian M. Feldman, Nicolino Ruperto, Amita Aggarwal, Sheila T. Angeles‐Han, Maria Bäckström, Erin Balay‐Dustrude, Claudia Bracaglia, Fabrizio De Benedetti, Pavla Doležalová, Jaime Guzmán, Daniel B. Horton, Ronald M. Laxer, Daniel J. Lovell, Tonje Løvli, Silvia Magni‐Manzoni, Francesca Minoia, Esi M. Morgan, Jane Munro, Ellen Nordal, Christophe Normand, Nancy Pan, Elisa Patrone, Angelo Ravelli, Cláudia Saad Magalhães, Rashmi Sinha, Joost F. Swart, Maarit Tarkiainen, Marinka Twilt, Paula Vähäsalo, Sebastiaan J. Vastert, Jelena Vojinović, Pamela F. Weiss, Beth S. Gottlieb, Alessandro Consolaro

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversitetssykehuset Nord-NorgeChildhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research AllianceUniversitetet i Tromsø
KeywordsMedicineTask forceVotingConsensus conferenceArthritisMajority rulePhysical therapyDiseaseFamily medicinePathologyInternal medicineArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.007
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207