MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407623351 · doi:10.1002/cam4.70623

Inequities in the Time to Colon Cancer Diagnosis Among Individuals With Severe Psychiatric Illness

2025· article· en· W4407623351 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jonah H. Gorodensky, Laura Davis, Rebecca Griffiths, Oyedeji Ayonrinde, Colleen Webber, Timothy P. Hanna, Natalie G. Coburn, Alyson Mahar

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreBruyèreHealth Sciences CentreOttawa HospitalQueen's University
FundersCanadian Cancer Society
KeywordsMedicineColorectal cancerCancerBipolar disorderDepression (economics)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryHealth careAmbulatory careConfidence intervalInternal medicineMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Early colon cancer detection is critical for improving outcomes. The diagnostic interval is a useful approach to conceptualizing time-to-diagnosis within the healthcare system and understanding the diagnostic journey. Adults with severe psychiatric illness (SPI) are less likely to participate in cancer screening and more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancers. We investigated the association between having an SPI and the colon cancer diagnostic interval. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults diagnosed with colon cancer in Ontario, Canada between 2007 and 2019 using administrative health data. Individuals with healthcare encounters consistent with pre-existing major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other non-organic psychotic illnesses were considered as having SPI. Individuals with an SPI-related hospitalization were categorized as having an inpatient SPI; the rest were considered outpatient. We calculated the diagnostic interval as the number of days from first colon cancer-related healthcare encounter to cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic pathways were assessed descriptively, including whether diagnosis was made symptomatically or with no symptom recorded. Quantile regression (stratified by symptom status) was used to quantify the association between SPI status and the diagnostic interval. RESULTS: We identified 42,143 individuals with colon cancer: 40,884 with no history of mental illness, 835 with a history of outpatient SPI, and 424 with inpatient SPI. Adults with SPI were significantly more likely to be diagnosed symptomatically (inpatient: 89.9%, outpatient: 86.6%, no SPI: 80.9%, p < 0.001). Individuals with SPI experienced a significantly longer median symptomatic diagnostic interval and a similar median diagnostic interval when diagnosed with no symptom recorded, relative to those without a history of mental illness. After adjusting for covariates, the median symptomatic diagnostic interval was 48 days longer (95% CI 28, 68) among individuals with outpatient SPI and 55 days longer (95% CI 28, 82) among individuals with inpatient SPI compared to those with no SPI. CONCLUSION: Individuals with SPI were more likely to be diagnosed symptomatically and had longer symptomatic diagnostic intervals than those without. This study represents a first step in targeting and improving cancer diagnostic processes for individuals with SPI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer MedicineSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207