MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407626438 · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122692

A reinforcement learning-based ensemble forecasting framework for renewable energy forecasting

2025· article· en· W4407626438 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiyuan Wu, Guohua Fang, Jian Ye, David Z. Zhu, Xianfeng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReinforcement learningRenewable energyProbabilistic forecastingEnsemble learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDemand forecastingTechnology forecastingMachine learningEngineeringOperations research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The randomness and intermittency of wind and photovoltaic power generation can negatively affect the stability of power systems . Therefore, accurate forecasting of these energy outputs is crucial for effective power system management . Among various forecasting methods, ensemble forecasting has gained attention for its superior performance and reliability. However, traditional ensemble methods, such as weighted averaging and stacking, use fixed model combinations that fail to adapt to varying wind and radiation conditions, thereby limiting their accuracy. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a novel ensemble forecasting framework based on reinforcement learning. The framework uses a deep Q-network to dynamically select the appropriate base model for different wind and radiation conditions. The learning process is supported by a model control module, a basic forecasting module, and a performance evaluation module. Independent experiments conducted across 14 regions in China validate the framework's effectiveness, showing a significant improvement in forecasting accuracy. The framework achieved an average improvement of 12.18 % in mean absolute scaled error over base models and 4.84 % over other ensemble methods. Additionally, this study analyzes the impact of different reinforcement learning models and sample sizes on the framework's performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenewable EnergySame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207