MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rectangular Phased Array Scanning Loss Error When the Active Element Patterns are Calibrated at Boresight or Approximated by a Unit-cell

2024· article· en· W4407628319 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher G. Hynes, Rodney G. Vaughan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhased arrayUnit (ring theory)OpticsPhased-array opticsAcousticsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Designing phased arrays is simplified by assuming the elements have a common pattern, often the infinite array unitcell or average active element pattern. A similar approach can simplify the phased array calibration, where all the variations between the RF front-end electronics are calibrated out using a single beam direction and the element patterns are assumed to be identical. This paper presents the error in the steered realized gain for a rectangular patch phased array when the active element patterns are approximated using an infinite array unit-cell pattern. The impacts on the realized gain from using a simple boresight gain and phase calibration are also presented. All results are derived from simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207