MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407634717 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21883-5

Unveiling the disparities between private and public preschools in the risk for pinworm infections in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4407634717 on OpenAlexaff
Fanzhen Mao, Xiang-Zhen Xu, Fengzai Tang, Bixian Ni, Qiang Zhang, Jiayao Zhang, Yaobao Liu, You Li, Jun Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatological diseases and infestations
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceJiangsu Commission of Health
KeywordsMedicineBiostatisticsCross-sectional studyPublic healthChinaEnvironmental healthEpidemiologyFamily medicineInternal medicineNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities. METHODS: A three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections. RESULTS: This study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public HealthSame topicDermatological diseases and infestationsFrench-language works237,207