MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407641222 · doi:10.3390/ijms26041717

Bicyclic N,S-Acetals Containing Fused Cysteine-Amide System as New Heterocyclic Class Targeting Human Farnesyltransferase (FTase-h)

2025· article· en· W4407641222 on OpenAlexaff
Fanny Danton, Mohamed Othman, Ata Martin Lawson, Amaury Farce, Emmanuelle Lipka, Alina Ghinet, Ján Moncóľ, Abdelhabib Semlali, Adam Daı̈ch

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFarnesyltransferaseChemistrySulfoxideSulfoneAmideCysteineBicyclic moleculeCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryHydrochlorideOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report in this contribution the synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of a novel class of chiral thiazoloisoindolinone scaffolds as potent inhibitors against human farnesyltransferase (FTase-h). The targeted products, sulfides (4), sulfoxides (5,6), and sulfones (7), containing up to three points of diversification, were obtained in a short-step sequence starting from the available and cost-effective L-cysteine hydrochloride (1), which is the source of N and S atoms and the chiral pool, and α-carbonyl benzoic acids (2), which are isoindolinone precursors. Concisely, the key ester intermediates (1) provide (a) sulfide-amides (4) by solvent-free amidation, (b) sulfoxides (5,6) by selective S-oxidation using NaIO4, and (c) sulfones (7) by oxidation using MMPP. Finally, the obtained N,S-acetal systems have shown promising inhibitory activities on FTase-h in the nanomolar range with excellent half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values up to 4.0 nanomolar (for example, 25.1 nM for sulfide 4bI, 67.3 nM for sulfone 7bG, and more interesting of 4.03 nM for sulfoxide 5bG).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207