MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407641708 · doi:10.1190/geo2024-0039.1

Multi-geophysical information neural network for seismic tomography

2025· article· en· W4407641708 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiwen Xue, Xinming Wu, Jianwei Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSeismic tomographyGeologyTomographyGeophysicsArtificial neural networkGeophysical imagingSeismologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Velocity is a key parameter in geophysics, particularly in near-surface studies, wherein subsurface structures are shaped by complex geologic processes. Accurate modeling of such structures is critical for imaging deeper formations and improving subsurface interpretations. Modern data acquisition techniques, such as digital geologic outcrops and micrologging, provide valuable structural information that enhances the accuracy of near-surface velocity models. Traveltime tomography has long been a widely used approach for near-surface velocity modeling. However, its application is often constrained by challenges surrounding the management of complex grid configurations and the nonlinear nature of inversion, particularly when integrating data sets of varying types, scales, and resolutions. Physics-informed neural networks have recently emerged as a promising solution to these challenges. Nevertheless, the inherent underdetermination in inversion means that these methods continue to suffer from issues with nonuniqueness and limited resolution, rendering them insufficient for near-surface modeling. To address these challenges, a novel method, the multi-geophysical information neural network for seismic tomography (MINN-tomo), is developed. This approach directly incorporates diverse data sets into the loss function, providing a unified framework for handling data fusion across different scales during nonlinear inversion. Considering data acquisition for the near-surface, geologic outcrops and micrologging are incorporated to ensure spatial continuity and improve the velocity resolution, thereby enhancing the accuracy of the near-surface velocity model. The flexibility and efficiency of MINN-tomo are verified using four representative synthetic models: one featuring significant near-surface characteristics, one based on the rugged seabed topography of the South China Sea, one derived from the near-surface segment of the Foothill model, and the standard Marmousi model. Additionally, the impact of key parameters within the developed framework is evaluated, highlighting its robustness and adaptability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207