MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407642368 · doi:10.4095/pj9v8epnds

Descriptions of nine measured surface stratigraphic sections of Cambrian to Cretaceous strata in the Northwest Territories part of the Sekwi Mountain map area (NTS 105-P)

2025· report· en· W4407642368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. Morrow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousPaleontologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nine measured stratigraphic sections located in the Sekwi Mountain map area (NTS 105-P) part of the Northwest Territories are described here. These sections include strata that range in measured thickness from several hundred metres, to over two thousand metres, and that range in age from Cambrian to Cretaceous time. Almost all strata measured are Paleozoic in age, and they document lithostratigraphic details of the east to west shelf-to-basin transition of the lower Paleozoic in the Sekwi Mountain map area. One section includes strata from an outlier of Cretaceous siliciclastics contained within a thrust panel of Paleozoic strata in the northeast quadrant of the Sekwi Mountain map area. The contact of these siliciclastics is documented here as a deeply erosional surface with probable deep vadose cavern-fillings within underlying Paleozoic carbonates tens of metres below their upper contact with overlying siliciclastics. Siliciclastic silicified grey shale strata immediately overlying Paleozoic carbonates in this section may be as old as Permian, as suggested by previous workers, or may simply be part of the same depositional event that formed the overlying Cretaceous strata, and therefore Cretaceous in age also.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→