MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407647643 · doi:10.1080/15376494.2025.2459358

Topology optimization of structures with steady-state heat conduction using an improved parameterized level set method

2025· article· en· W4407647643 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Wang, Mingtao Cui, Li Wang, Mengjiao Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
KeywordsParameterized complexityTopology optimizationThermal conductionSteady state (chemistry)Topology (electrical circuits)Set (abstract data type)Level set methodLevel set (data structures)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Materials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringFinite element methodStructural engineeringAlgorithmChemistryCombinatoricsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an improved parameterized level set method to handle topology optimization design of structures with steady-state heat conduction. In this method, the level set function (LSF) is interpolated using compactly-supported radial basis functions. Thus, it is more convenient and efficient to evolve the LSF, while ensuring the smoothness of the optimized boundary. The shape sensitivity constraint factor is used to improve computational efficiency. Furthermore, an approximate re-initialization scheme is adopted after each of iteration to keep the gradient of the LSF boundary stable, thereby improving the numerical stability and convergence speed of the structural topology optimization process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanics of Advanced Materials and StructuresSame topicTopology Optimization in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207