MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407657899 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-22

An Efficient Numerical Technique for Solving the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers Equation

2025· article· en· W4407657899 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmad Alalyani, Dilveen M. Ahmed, Bewar A. Mahmood

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBurgers' equationKorteweg–de Vries equationApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPartial differential equationNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear partial differential equations, such as the Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers equation (KDVB), receive extensive study in a multitude of fields of engineering and physics. This study presents the Variational Homotopy Perturbation Method (VHPM) as a robust numerical technique for approximating solutions to the KDVB equation. The technique integrates the Variational Iteration Method (VIM) with the Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM), providing an efficient solution without requiring the discretization or linearization of the equation. The efficacy of the proposed scheme is demonstrated through various problems, with the accuracy of the method being assessed using absolute errors in the and error norms. The results indicate that the proposed method is straightforward to implement and provides superior outcomes compared to the existing schemes documented in the literature. This study offers a substantial contribution to the advancement of numerical techniques for solving nonlinear partial differential equations, providing beneficial applications across diverse scientific and engineering fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207