MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407665681 · doi:10.1142/s0218127425300101

Modeling and Analysis of Cellular Neural Networks Based on Memcapacitor

2025· article· en· W4407665681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDepartment of Education of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceMathematicsBiological systemArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducing the memcapacitor into the Cellular Neural Network (CNN), the Memcapacitor-Cellular Neural Network (MC-CNN) model with infinitely many equilibrium points is constructed. A series of dynamical behaviors of the MC-CNN are investigated by various nonlinear system analysis means. It is shown that the system has a large maximum Lyapunov exponent in a specific parameter range. And with the variation of parameters, the system is able to produce many different phase trajectories of the attractor. Multistability is also found in the system. The pseudo-randomness of the MC-CNN is calculated by Spectral Entropy (SE) complexity algorithm. The final hardware results proves the physical realizability of the system. The MC-CNN model is intended to provide guidance for neural networks and cryptographic strategies based on the memcapacitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it