MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407665681 · doi:10.1142/s0218127425300101

Modeling and Analysis of Cellular Neural Networks Based on Memcapacitor

2025· article· en· W4407665681 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Mou, Yinghong Cao, Hadi Jahanshahi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDepartment of Education of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceMathematicsBiological systemArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducing the memcapacitor into the Cellular Neural Network (CNN), the Memcapacitor-Cellular Neural Network (MC-CNN) model with infinitely many equilibrium points is constructed. A series of dynamical behaviors of the MC-CNN are investigated by various nonlinear system analysis means. It is shown that the system has a large maximum Lyapunov exponent in a specific parameter range. And with the variation of parameters, the system is able to produce many different phase trajectories of the attractor. Multistability is also found in the system. The pseudo-randomness of the MC-CNN is calculated by Spectral Entropy (SE) complexity algorithm. The final hardware results proves the physical realizability of the system. The MC-CNN model is intended to provide guidance for neural networks and cryptographic strategies based on the memcapacitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207