MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive silicon synapse and CMOS neuron for neuromorphic VLSI computing

2025· article· en· W4407667602 on OpenAlexaff
Ziad El-Khatib, Sherif Moussa, Firuz Kamalov, M.C.E. Yagoub

Bibliographic record

VenueIAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceSynapseCMOSComputer architectureNeuronSiliconArtificial neural networkNeuroscienceArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceEmbedded systemOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of a fully integrated adaptive modified complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) synapse circuit is presented. By using multiple-gated transistor configuration in the modified CMOS synapse an additional branch provide control where the synaptic output current time-constant is tuned. The effect of changing the multiple-gated transistor bias voltage from 0.25 to 0.45 V tunes the spiking output current exponential time-constant range by 200 ms as shown in simulation results. Moreover, a fully-integrated adaptive quadratic integrate-and-fire (QIF) CMOS neuron circuit is presented as well. A differential pair with variable capacitor integrator and a tunable schmitt trigger threshold detector circuit are integrated in the CMOS neuron that can be tuned varying its spiking frequency. The proposed adaptive quadratic integrate-and-fire (AQIF) neuron has the ability to adjust the spiking frequency without changing the input current. The simulation results show the proposed CMOS neuron circuit spiking frequency can be tuned from 58.4 to 312.5 Hz and its spiking period from 17.1 to 3.2 ms with tuning the bias voltage of variable capacitor integrator. Having a peak voltage Vpeak=0.95 V, a reset voltage Vreset=-0.75 V and a voltage threshold of 0.35 V with a membrane potential range of 1.5 V. The proposed CMOS neuron circuit is designed in 130 nm process with a supply voltage of 1.8 V and a total power dissipation of 1.8 mW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIAES International Journal of Artificial IntelligenceSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207