Advancements in Lignin Valorization for Energy Storage Applications: Sustainable Technologies for Lignin Extraction and Hydrothermal Carbonization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conversion of industrial waste lignin into sustainable carbon materials is an essential step towards reducing dependency on fossil fuels and mitigating environmental impacts. This review explores various aspects of lignin utilization, with particular focus on the extraction of lignin and the application of lignin-derived carbon materials in energy storge applications. The review explores advanced chemical methods to improve the efficiency of biomass conversion, detailing emerging technologies for lignin extraction from various biomasses using innovative solvents and techniques, such as Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs). Additionally, it discusses the parameters that impact the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process. The produced hydrochar shows potential for use as optimized precursors for energy storage applications. This review also considers the implications of these technologies for environmental sustainability and the circular economy, suggesting future research directions to enhance and scale these processes for global impact. This comprehensive analysis highlights the critical role of advanced biomass conversion technologies in achieving sustainability and outlines pathways for future lignin-based carbon materials innovations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".