MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407677702 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00492

Basal ganglia and cerebellar lesions causally impact the neural encoding of temporal regularities

2025· article· en· W4407677702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Music Perception
Canadian institutionsInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research
FundersKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
KeywordsBasal gangliaNeuroscienceBiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acting in and adapting to a dynamically changing environment necessitates to precisely encode the timing of sensory events, and to time our own (re-)actions to them. Cerebellar (CE) and basal ganglia (BG) circuitries play fundamental and complementary roles in timing processes. While the CE seems to use precise timing (when an event occurs) and temporal intervals to generate temporal predictions (when a next event occurs), the BG uses relative timing to extract the beat in rhythmic sequences. As it is generally difficult to record data from respective patient groups in parallel, CE and BG contributions to timing processes are rarely investigated in combination. Here, we let healthy controls and patients with CE or BG lesions listen to isochronous auditory sequences while their EEG was recorded. We assessed intra- and inter-individual variabilities, as well as group differences, using event-related potentials (ERP), delta-band inter-trial phase-coherence, and acceleration dynamics while tuning to the stimulation frequency (Sf). CE and BG lesions increased variability in ERP latency and reduced the coherence of delta-band activity. CE but not BG lesions further impacted the stability of delta-band oscillations while tuning to the Sf. These findings show a causal link between subcortical lesions and the capacity to encode and synchronize ongoing neural activity with temporal regularities in the acoustic environment. While most standard metrics of neural entrainment do not dissociate specific contributions of BG and CE to sound processing in isochronous sequences, the newly introduced ‘stability’ metric isolated distinct changes in delta-band tuning dynamics in CE patients. This observation highlights the fundamental role of the CE in generating and maintaining stable neural representations of event onsets in the sensory environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it