MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407679053 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017101

Social franchising in healthcare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of implementation and outcomes

2025· review· en· W4407679053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Global Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFranchising Strategies and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshUK Research and InnovationEconomic and Social Research CouncilGlobal Affairs CanadaUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsCINAHLHealth careOutreachPublic relationsBusinessSocial marketingPolitical scienceEconomic growthMedicineNursingPsychological interventionEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The growing prominence of social franchising in healthcare underscores the need to analyse its implementation and impacts; however, substantial research gaps remain. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of evidence to analyse the social franchise models, implementation and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in February 2024 on Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus using terms related to 'social franchising' in healthcare. We conducted a qualitative narrative synthesis of study findings into five thematic areas: client impact and utilisation, healthcare outcomes, financial sustainability, innovative technologies and awareness activities. RESULTS: From 4184 search results, 47 studies were included in the analysis. We identified 29 social franchises across 25 countries. Social franchises were mostly present in Africa, Asia and Central America. Most franchises focused on sexual, reproductive and maternal health (n=18) and family planning (FP) (n=25), and most included training (n=21), service provision (n=17) and financial support (n=12). Franchising improved client volumes, satisfaction and contraceptive continuation rates and increased access to healthcare. Vouchers and subsidised services reduced the financial burden among clients. Telemedicine and call centres enhanced healthcare delivery, and community outreach and marketing increased awareness and modern contraceptive use. However, franchises struggled to reach poorer populations due to high fees and competition from public services. It often did not improve FP, reproductive healthcare and child nutrition and had limited branding and promotional activities. Additionally, heavy reliance on donor funding threatened long-term sustainability. CONCLUSION: Social franchising presents a potential strategy for expanding healthcare access and improving service delivery, though outcomes regarding the effectiveness of social franchising vary across regions. More research is needed to evaluate digital technology use and the long-term impact, equity and sustainability of social franchising. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022328104.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it