MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407680947 · doi:10.22459/ta58.2024.11

Rock art from caves in the Keerom Regency, Papua Province

2025· book-chapter· en· W4407680947 on OpenAlex
Klementin Fairyo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Artistic Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaveArchaeologyGeographyRock artGeologyAncient historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rock paintings of Keerom Regency have not been previously researched.The purpose of this study is to describe the different forms of rock paintings in Keerom, near the border between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, in relation to their social function and current meaning to the indigenous people who inhabit the surrounding area.A literature review and interviews with local stakeholders supplement the morphological and pictorial analyses of each painting site.The results of this analysis show that rock paintings in Keerom Regency consist of both figurative and non-figurative motifs, especially at the sites of Web and Kibay.The present meaning of these rock paintings to the local people in the Keerom Regency is tightly connected with religion and social communication.For the indigenous people in this area, the rock paintings are symbols of identity and important cultural elements that are used to preserve social boundaries and territory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it