MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407681564 · doi:10.1145/3641555.3705082

The eKitchen: Creating Opportunities for Community-based Sustainable Computing Education through Action Research

2025· article· en· W4407681564 on OpenAlexaff
Esther Roorda, Sathish Gopalakrishnan, Emily Shilton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Computer scienceKnowledge management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From increasing rates of e-waste production to astonishing datacenter carbon emissions, the ecological effects of computing are staggering. Computer engineering and computer science students need to understand the social and environmental context of their work, and to develop practical skills required to build more sustainable solutions. Learning sustainable development skills is challenging in a traditional university classroom: meaningfully building these skills and mindsets requires holistic, student-centered approaches, including situative, experiential, and community-centered strategies. While educators and universities have begun to integrate sustainability into curricula, we propose another approach, building a community of learning through collaboration with students and the wider community. The eKitchen is a university-based community of practice, whose purpose is to give students opportunities to develop hands-on skills in electronic repair and sustainable computer engineering, reduce e-waste on campus, and advocate for sustainable computing through public outreach, workshops and community partnerships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0020.021
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207