MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407682330 · doi:10.1093/qopen/qoaf008

Beyond rice: the rise of salt-tolerant potatoes and sweet potatoes in Bangladesh?

2025· article· en· W4407682330 on OpenAlexaff
M Günther, Sophia Lüttringhaus, Katarina von Witzke, Hanna Ewell, Raphael Nawrotzki, Thomas Miethbauer

Bibliographic record

VenueQ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFisheries and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersFP7 International CooperationDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitBundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
KeywordsSalt (chemistry)AgronomyBusinessToxicologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Southern Bangladesh, where rice dominates as the staple crop, the introduction of salt-tolerant potato and sweet potato varieties aims to enhance agricultural productivity and address food and nutrition insecurity in response to climate change and soil salinization. This study evaluates the impact of an intervention that disseminated improved varieties alongside agronomy and nutrition training. Using ex-post data from 1,621 farmers, treated and untreated, recalling the 2022/2023 and 2018/2019 seasons, a matched difference-in-difference analysis reveals an Average Treatment Effect on the Treated on sweet potato yield of 4.8 tonnes/ha (33 per cent increase) but no effect on potato yield. Yet, there is evidence for widespread disadoption of the improved varieties. Results from a Heckman selection model, including robustness checks for heterogeneity, suggest that positive yield effects stem mostly from training. Although no significant difference in food and nutrition security was observed between treated and comparison households, we note a shift in cultivation patterns. Potatoes, traditionally grown by men as cash crops, were increasingly cultivated by women to combat food insecurity, whilst sweet potatoes, traditionally grown for consumption, became more commercialized. This study shows the importance of timely planned evaluations of agriculture projects that carefully consider the interplay of adoption, training, consumption, and gender, highlighting the need for locally targeted initiatives to address food and nutrition insecurity in climate-vulnerable regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQ OpenSame topicFisheries and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207