MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endogenous production of nitric oxide by iNOS in human cells restricts inflammatory activation and cholesterol/fatty acid biosynthesis

2025· article· en· W4407684967 on OpenAlexafffund
Franklin Tam, Jenice M. Dumlao, Amy Lee, Jonathan C. Choy

Bibliographic record

VenueFree Radical Biology and Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNitric oxideEndogenyBiosynthesisChemistryBiochemistryCholesterolFatty acidEnzymeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitric oxide (NO) is a bioactive gas that is known to control many physiological processes. In human parenchymal cells, the function of iNOS-derived NO is incompletely understood. Here, we used RNA-seq to examine the role of iNOS-derived NO in the control of gene expression in a human lung epithelial cell line treated with inflammatory cytokines. iNOS-derived NO restricted the expression of genes involved in immune signaling, including the immune-related genes CXCL9 and E-selectin that were not previously known to be inhibited by iNOS. We also determined that iNOS-derived NO inhibits the expression of genes needed for cholesterol/fatty acid biosynthesis in response to cytokine stimulation, a process not previously known to be affected by NO. These findings establish the regulation of immune activation and cholesterol/fatty acid biosynthesis as main functions of iNOS in human parenchymal cells. • iNOS activity controls the expression of many genes in response to cytokine stimulation in a lung epithelial cell line. • iNOS-derived NO restricts the expression of genes involved in inflammatory activation. • iNOS-derived NO inhibits the expression of genes needed for cholesterol/fatty acid biosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFree Radical Biology and MedicineSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207