MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407685465 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115492

A model-based continuous commissioning method for an efficient integration of ground source heat pumps in the building ecosystem

2025· article· en· W4407685465 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Giulio Tonellato, Michaël Kummert, José A. Candanedo, Gabrielle Beaudry, Philippe Pasquier

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookePolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceHeat pumpProject commissioningEcosystemEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringComputer scienceCivil engineeringMechanical engineeringEcologyHeat exchanger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a model-based continuous commissioning (MBCCx) methodology specifically designed for the identification of control-related performance gaps within heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems equipped with ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs). While conventional continuous commissioning (CCx) is effective in detecting energy performance gaps, MBCCx goes further by using a system model as a reference to pinpoint operational inefficiencies and control faults arising from subsystem integration. The core of the proposed methodology lies in a calibrated physics-based model that represents the system performance as intended during the design phase. A key advantage is its applicability early in a building’s operational phase , when data is limited, unlike data-driven methods that rely on extensive historical datasets. This enables the identification of energy-saving opportunities before the system reaches a stable operational state. To address the limitations of prior studies that often focus solely on individual GSHP component performance, this work pioneers the application of MBCCx to whole buildings equipped with GSHPs. The proposed approach employs a detailed 3D building model and component-level HVAC modeling to predict parameters such as room temperatures, heat pump power, and ground heat exchanger temperatures under normal conditions. Significant deviations between monitored values and model predictions serve as indicators of underperforming components or control sequence anomalies. The anomaly detection accuracy is then improved by merging HVAC system and GSHP performance indicators. The methodology is demonstrated through a case study of a recently retrofitted elementary school in Québec, Canada, equipped with five standing column wells as ground heat exchangers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207