Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase Plus Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio Index: A Promising Biomarker Associated with Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a significant contributor to cancer-related illness and death. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an essential treatment approach; however, optimal patient selection remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model using hematological biomarkers to assess the efficacy of NAC in patients with CRLM. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 214 CRLM patients treated with the XELOX regimen. Blood characteristics before and after NAC, as well as the ratios of these biomarkers, were integrated into the machine learning models. Logistic regression, decision trees (DTs), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and AdaBoost were used for predictive modeling. The performance of the models was evaluated using the AUROC, F1-score, and external validation. RESULTS: The DT (AUROC: 0.915, F1-score: 0.621) and RF (AUROC: 0.999, F1-score: 0.857) models demonstrated the best predictive performance in the training cohort. The model incorporating the ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment gamma-glutamyl transferase (rGGT) and carcinoembryonic antigen (rCEA) formed the GCR index, which achieved an AUROC of 0.853 in the external validation. The GCR index showed strong clinical relevance, predicting better chemotherapy responses in patients with lower rCEA and higher rGGT levels. CONCLUSIONS: The GCR index serves as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of NAC in CRLM, providing a valuable clinical reference for the prognostic assessment of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".