Geochronology, Petrogenesis, and Geological Significance of the Longchahe Granite, Gejiu Sn Polymetallic Ore District, SW China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Longchahe porphyritic granite is the largest pluton within the western Gejiu complex, a series of mainly intermediate to felsic alkali intrusions in southwestern China. Our research indicates that the pluton intruded during the Late Cretaceous (82–84 Ma). The pluton is primarily a medium- to coarse-grained porphyritic granite, which shows weakly peraluminous (A/CNK = 0.92–1.82, with an average of 1.09) and alkali (shoshonitic) characteristics, exhibiting an affinity with highly differentiated I-type granite. The porphyritic granite is enriched in K and Rb, but depleted in Ba, P, and Ti, and displays significant enrichment of light rare earth elements with minor negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.46–0.66). It has elevated (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (0.71243–0.71301), negative εNd(t) values (−8.42–−6.46), and a broad range of εHf(t) values (−13.80–9.17). These geochemical characteristics indicate that the formation of Longchahe granite involved both crust–mantle assimilation and strong crystal fractionation. Additionally, the pluton demonstrates a significant enrichment of W. A factor analysis study suggests that the formation of granites is associated with F1 (Nb–Ta–Th–LREE–HREE–[W]), whilst F2 represents Sn–Pb–U–[Zn] polymetallic mineralisation in western Gejiu. Further, a score diagram indicates that the granites exhibit a high abundance of ore-forming elements, with potential for Pb and Zn mineralisation. Our study favours that the Longchahe granites likely formed within a continental arc–tectonic setting, related to subduction and subsequent rotation processes experienced by the Paleo-Pacific plate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".