Graph Isomorphic Network-Assisted Optimal Coordination of Wave Energy Converters Based on Maximum Power Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oceans are a major source of clean energy, harnessing the vast and consistent power of waves to generate electricity. Today, they are seen as a vital renewable and clean solution for transitioning to a complete fossil fuel-free future world. To get the most out of ocean wave potential, Wave Energy Converters (WECs) are being used to harness the power of ocean waves into usable electrical energy. To this end, to maximize the power generated from the WECs, two strategies for WEC design improvement and optimal coordination can be considered. Among these, optimal coordination is the more straightforward method to implement. However, most of the recently developed coordination strategies are dynamic-based, encountering challenges as the system’s scale expands and grows larger. Consequently, a novel Graph Isomorphic Network (GIN)-based model is presented in this paper. The proposed model consists of the following five layers: the input graph, two GIN convolutional layers (GIN Conv.1, and 2), a mean pooling layer, and the output layer. The target of total generated power is predicted based on the features of the generated power from each WEC and the related spatial coordinates {xi,yi}. Subsequently, based on the anticipated total power considered by the model, the system enables maximum generation. The model performs spatial coordination analyses to present the optimal coordination for each WEC to achieve the objective of maximizing total generated power. The proposed model is evaluated through several Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), achieving the least number of errors in prediction and optimal coordination performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".