MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407701449 · doi:10.3390/electronics14040795

Graph Isomorphic Network-Assisted Optimal Coordination of Wave Energy Converters Based on Maximum Power Generation

2025· article· en· W4407701449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersWave energy converterPower (physics)GraphElectricity generationMaximum power principleComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)MathematicsElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringTheoretical computer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oceans are a major source of clean energy, harnessing the vast and consistent power of waves to generate electricity. Today, they are seen as a vital renewable and clean solution for transitioning to a complete fossil fuel-free future world. To get the most out of ocean wave potential, Wave Energy Converters (WECs) are being used to harness the power of ocean waves into usable electrical energy. To this end, to maximize the power generated from the WECs, two strategies for WEC design improvement and optimal coordination can be considered. Among these, optimal coordination is the more straightforward method to implement. However, most of the recently developed coordination strategies are dynamic-based, encountering challenges as the system’s scale expands and grows larger. Consequently, a novel Graph Isomorphic Network (GIN)-based model is presented in this paper. The proposed model consists of the following five layers: the input graph, two GIN convolutional layers (GIN Conv.1, and 2), a mean pooling layer, and the output layer. The target of total generated power is predicted based on the features of the generated power from each WEC and the related spatial coordinates {xi,yi}. Subsequently, based on the anticipated total power considered by the model, the system enables maximum generation. The model performs spatial coordination analyses to present the optimal coordination for each WEC to achieve the objective of maximizing total generated power. The proposed model is evaluated through several Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), achieving the least number of errors in prediction and optimal coordination performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it