A phase 1/2 study of detalimogene voraplasmid (EG-70) intravesical monotherapy for patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS886 Background: High-risk NMIBC is generally treated with adjuvant intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG); however, ~50% of patients experience recurrence and/or progression after BCG and are considered unresponsive. Detalimogene voraplasmid (EG-70) is an investigational, intravesically administered therapy designed to elicit local stimulation of anti-tumor immune responses in the bladder and drive durable efficacy in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, while mitigating the risk of systemic toxicities from immune stimulation. The Phase 1 (dose-escalation) portion of the first-in-human Phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter study (LEGEND; NCT04752722) of detalimogene voraplasmid is complete. The Phase 2 dose was identified, treatment was generally well tolerated, and the overall complete response (CR) rate was 73% [Kalota S, et al. AUA 2024]. Here we describe the ongoing Phase 2 portion of the study, which opened to enrollment in May 2023; a new cohort of papillary only (no carcinoma in situ [CIS]) disease is being included. Methods: Eligibility criteria: age ≥18 years; ECOG PS 0−2; NMIBC, with/without resected coexisting papillary tumors, ineligible for, or elected not to undergo, cystectomy; satisfactory bladder function. Patients receive detalimogene voraplasmid 0.8 mg/mL in 50 mL (intravesical administration, Weeks 1, 2, 5 & 6, 12-week cycle) for 4 cycles: BCG-unresponsive with CIS (Cohort 1); BCG-exposed or BCG-naïve with CIS (Cohort 2); BCG-unresponsive with high-grade papillary bladder cancer without CIS (Cohort 3). Phase 2 primary endpoints: efficacy (CR rate at Week 48); safety. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival; CR rate at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48; duration of response. The study is being conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and is consistent with ICH/GCP. All patients provide written informed consent. The Phase 2 portion of the study is enrolling and will recruit up to 300 patients from sites in the USA, Canada, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Clinical trial information: NCT04752722 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".