Integration of positive matrix factorization and water quality models for pollution source identification and water quality enhancement in rivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying the primary pollution source poses a challenge in river watersheds characterized by diverse land-cover types and mixed pollution sources. We addressed this challenge by focusing on the major tributaries influencing the water quality of the Mankyung River’s mainstream, successfully identifying the primary pollution source. Additionally, it identified the limiting nutrient for algal growth in the Mankyung River, proposing an alternative strategy to enhance water quality and mitigate algal growth. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) was employed to discern pollution sources in major tributaries, namely Jeonju-cheon and Iksan-cheon, impacting mainstream water quality. For Jeonju-cheon, pollution from urban and agricultural areas, including wastewater treatment plants, emerged as the primary source. For Iksan-cheon, pollution from urban and agricultural areas predominated. The nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio and correlation analysis revealed that total phosphorus is the limiting factor for algal growth. Furthermore, scenarios to improve water quality and reduce algal growth were developed, and the Environmental Fluid Dynamic Code (EFDC) was used in the simulation, while the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) was used in water quality assessment. The findings demonstrated improved water quality and decreased algal blooms in the downstream Mankyung River region. This research provides a foundation for applying PMF, the EFDC, and the WQI in tracking pollution sources and enhancing water quality in rivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".