EXTRAPOLATION OF THE NORTHERN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE OF ADULT EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT IN NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL SPACE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays informal adult education is viewed as a means of adults educational needs fulfilment, their perfection and self-development and as a mechanism of democratic society formation, for it helps to form socially active citizens, who are mobile in professional and social contexts to rapid changes in social environment. Key concepts in American and Canadian state and society formation are «activity», «civil society», «democratic society». Movement for civil rights is the most vivid social phenomenon in Canadian and American history. The aim of the article is to work out recommendations concerning creative application of positive American and Canadian experience in reformation of national system of adult education. For fulfilment of the mentioned aim the following methods are applied: a system of general theoretical methods in particular analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, concrete scientific methods in particular term analysis and historical genetic analysis. Analysis of peculiarities of adult education development in different historical periods in Ukraine is conducted. Adult education as an important element of civil society formation in the USA and Canada is viewed. Analysis of concepts «active citizenship» and «democratic citizenship» is conducted. Principles of informal adult education are systematized. Recommendations concerning creative application of positive ideas of American and Canadian experience in national adult education system are worked out. Results of the conducted research work give opportunity to state that American and Canadian experience in the field of adult education can help to create harmony between national traditions and world achievements on the basis of humanism and democracy; to give high quality educational service to adults, synchronize national system of adult education with world tendencies, provide conditions for adult education development and its influence on economic development of state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".