MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407721120 · doi:10.7202/1115976ar

<i>Up There</i> de Wael Kadour et la mise en scène de l’expérience perdue

2024· article· fr· W4407721120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniela Potenza, Wael Kadour

Bibliographic record

VenuePercées Explorations en arts vivants · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth African History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans sa dernière pièce, Up There (2022), le dramaturge syrien Wael Kadour s’interroge sur ce qui aurait pu se produire dans sa vie artistique, mais qui n’a pourtant pas eu lieu. Kadour élabore ainsi une conscience individuelle et subjective du non-passé, une temporalité négative qui se développe tout au long du processus de création de la pièce, depuis son idéation au cours de la crise sanitaire de 2020 jusqu’à sa première en décembre 2022. Cette prise de conscience émane d’un retour dans le temps, entre 1991 et 2022, accompagné du regard d’Henrik Ibsen sur la société.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePercées Explorations en arts vivantsSame topicSouth African History and CultureFrench-language works237,207