MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407722290 · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5593

Sex-Specific Association of Myocardial Fibrosis With Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

2025· article· en· W4407722290 on OpenAlexaff
Soongu Kwak, Anvesha Singh, Russell J. Everett, Thomas A. Treibel, Jaehyun Lim, Sungho Won, Michelle A. Williams, Rong Bing, Neil Craig, Trisha Singh, Shruti Joshi, Heesun Lee, Whal Lee, Yong Jin Kim, Calvin Chin, Miho Fukui, Tarique Al Musa, Marzia Rigolli, Lionel Tastet, Laura E Dobson, Stephanie Wiesemann, Vanessa M. Ferreira, Gabriella Captur, Sahmin Lee, Jeanette Schulz‐Menger, Erik B. Schelbert, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Sung Ji Park, Costanza Pellegrini, Martin Hadamitzky, Bernhard Gerber, David E. Newby, Saul Myerson, P. Pibarot, João L. Cavalcante, Gerry P McCann, John P. Greenwood, James Moon, Marc R. Dweck, Seung‐Pyo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionStenosisMyocardial fibrosisAortic valve replacementFibrosisConcomitant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS) may exhibit sex differences. However, its prognostic significance in women with AS remains unclear. Objective: To investigate sex differences in myocardial fibrosis assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and evaluate its prognostic value in women and men with AS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with severe AS who underwent CMR before aortic valve replacement (AVR) were prospectively enrolled from 13 international sites between March 2011 and September 2021. Myocardial fibrosis was evaluated using extracellular volume fraction (ECV%) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The main analysis was conducted on patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as those with no history of myocardial infarction and no concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to February 2024. Exposures: Surgical or transcatheter AVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was post-AVR all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Results: Of 822 patients, 670 were without obstructive CAD (368 men [55%] and 302 women [45%]). Among these, women and men had a similar age (median, 72 years vs 71 years, respectively), comorbidities, and AS severity. ECV% was similar between sexes; however, women had less LGE (both infarct and noninfarct LGE). After a median follow-up of 3.7 (IQR, 2.1-4.7) years, there were 76 deaths (11.3%), including 29 adjudicated cardiovascular deaths, in patients without obstructive CAD. Increasing ECV% and LGE were associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in both sexes. Cox analyses demonstrated that both ECV% and LGE were associated with higher all-cause mortality without significant interaction by sex (women: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 per 1% ECV% increase; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P < .001; men: adjusted HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06; P = .66; P for interaction by sex = .09 and women: adjusted HR, 2.49 for the presence of LGE; 95% CI, 1.07-5.80; P = .03; men: adjusted HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.00-3.32; P = .04; P for interaction by sex = .68). In the entire population (n = 822), both noninfarct and infarct-related LGE were associated with increased mortality without significant interaction by sex. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients with severe AS who underwent AVR exhibited similar ECV% between sexes, while women had lower LGE. Increased myocardial fibrosis provided important prognostic value for both sexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA CardiologySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207