MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407724229 · doi:10.4000/13ccs

L’Assassinat du duc de Guise. Nouveau scénario (Henri Lavedan)

2023· article· fr· W4407724229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue1895 · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La récente acquisition par la BnF d’un dactylogramme annoté inédit d’Henri Lavedan révèle une nouvelle variante du scénario de l’Assassinat du duc de Guise qu’il écrivit pour le Film d’Art et qui fut tourné en 1908 par Charles Le Bargy et André Calmettes. Les différents changements, ajouts ou transformations témoignent de la volonté de l’écrivain de jouer avec les attentes du spectateur en mêlant les émotions, démarche dont on trouve maints exemples dans l’écriture pour la scène autour de 1900 et qui est développée ici avec une richesse et une subtilité totalement inhabituelles alors dans les films cinématographiques. Par ses retouches successives, ce document suggère le plaisir qu’Henri Lavedan a eu à travailler le premier tableau, celui où il était libre de laisser cours à son imagination théâtrale, alors qu’il s’est obligé dans les tableaux suivants à suivre de très près sa documentation historique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it