Reaching extreme laser intensities using multi-petawatt lasers interacting with micro-cones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Micro-cones so far mainly used for high energy density physics research have been proven to have an effective control on the fast electrons in the context of fast ignition research. In this paper we demonstrate by performing three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations that an ultra-high intensity laser pulse can be intensified 28 times at the interaction with plastic micro-cones. The extreme intensities of the focused laser which are reached at the interaction with the plastic micro-cones are important in the plasma and nuclear physics investigations of dark matter, non-linear quantum electrodynamics, and fission–fusion experiments to study the N = 126 waiting point for better understanding of the Universe. Furthermore, we observe that micro-cones can shorten ultra-high intensity laser pulses both in time and space. The highest intensification of the incident laser pulse varies in time but not in position being localized very close to the rear side of the micro-cone tip. Therefore, the micro-cone can be a useful device in relativistic plasma optics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".