Vitamin E Acetate Causes Softening of Pulmonary Surfactant Membrane Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The popularity of electronic cigarettes and vaping products has launched the outbreak of a condition affecting the respiratory system of users, known as electronic-cigarette/vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI). The build-up of vitamin E acetate (VEA), a diluent of some illicit vaping oils, in the bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with EVALI provided circumstantial evidence as a target for investigation. In this work, we provide a fundamental characterization of the interaction of VEA with lung cells and pulmonary surfactant (PS) models to explore the mechanisms by which vaping-related lung injuries may be present. We first confirm the localization and uptake of VEA in pulmonary epithelial cells. Further, as PS is vitally responsible for the biophysical functions of the lungs, we explore the effect of added VEA on three increasingly complex models of PS: dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), a lipid-only synthetic PS, and the biologically derived extract Curosurf. Using high-resolution techniques of small-angle X-ray scattering, small-angle neutron scattering, neutron spin-echo spectroscopy, and neutron reflectometry, we compare the molecular-scale behaviors of these membranes to the bulk viscoelastic properties of surfactant monolayer films as studied by Langmuir monolayer techniques. While VEA does not obviously alter the structure or organization of PS membranes, a consistent softening of membrane systems─regardless of compositional complexity─provides a biophysical explanation for the respiratory distress associated with EVALI and yields a new perspective on the behavior of the PS system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".