Adaptive Pricing-Based Optimized Resource Utilization in Networked Microgrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of networked microgrids primarily depends on the design of internal market structure for maximum resource utilization, optimized power sharing, and enhanced economic efficiency. This article presents a novel framework for resource optimization within the networked microgrids. First, each microgrid is optimized using a local energy management system to compute power shortage/surplus depending on various parameters including local generation (solar photovoltaic), battery energy storage system, and load profile. The total shortage/surplus is obtained by aggregating the shortage/surplus of each microgrid, facilitating the calculation of adaptive internal trade price. The internal trade prices are responsive to load variations and time-of-use prices, thereby encouraging internal trading within the networked microgrids. The internal trading price is strategically set to be lower than buying price from the grid and higher than selling price to the grid to maximize overall revenue of the entire network. Subsequently, a central energy management system is formulated, determining optimized power sharing between microgrids based on the adaptive internal trading. The proposed strategy is validated on the IEEE-33 bus test feeder using improved accelerated particle swarm optimization, achieving an annual power loss reduction of 1795.8 kW and an overall cost reduction of 7.2%. These results confirm the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed framework in real-world scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".