MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HSIFormer: An Efficient Vision Transformer Framework for Enhanced Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Local Window Attention

2024· article· en· W4407737361 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Q. Alkhatib, Ali Jamali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionWindow (computing)TransformerPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently gained significant attention in image classification due to their exceptional performance in computer vision. Building on this success, researchers are now investigating the potential of transformers in Earth observation applications. However, transformers face a significant challenge: they require substantially more training data than CNN classifiers. This makes their application in remote sensing, particularly with Hyperspectral Image (HSI) data, difficult due to the limited availability of labeled data. In this paper, we will repurpose the PolSARFormer model for hyperspectral image classification. Originally designed for polarized SAR image classification, the model's initial parameters have been fine-tuned to better meet the requirements of hyperspectral data. The PolSARFormer model employs a vision transformer (ViT)-based framework that utilizes 3D and 2D CNNs as feature extractors and incorporates local window attention (LWA) for effective HSI data classification. Extensive experimental results show that the model, HSIFormer, achieves better classification accuracy than the state-of-the-art Swin Transformer and ViT algorithms. HSIFormer outperformed the Swin Transformer and ViT by 2.31% and 3.24% in overall accuracy (OA) on the Pavia University benchmark dataset. Additionally, results on the Salinas dataset demonstrated that HSIFormer surpasses several other algorithms, including HybridSN (96.89%), Tri-CNN (97.05%), Vision Transformer (94.68%), 3D-CNN (96.77%), and Swin Transformer (95.62%), with a kappa index (KI) of 98.23%. The code will be made publicly available at https://https://github.com/mqalkhatib/HSIFormer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207