MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407748534 · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00811-6

The integrated stress response in neurodegenerative diseases

2025· review· en· W4407748534 on OpenAlexafffund
Maria Astrid Bravo-Jimenez, Shivangi Sharma, Soheila Karimi‐Abdolrezaee

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Neurodegeneration · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsNeurodegenerationNeuroscienceNeuroprotectionRegulatorDiseaseCellular stress responseBiologyMedicineNeurologyOxidative stressBioinformaticsFight-or-flight responsePathologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integrated stress response (ISR) is a conserved network in eukaryotic cells that mediates adaptive responses to diverse stressors. The ISR pathway ensures cell survival and homeostasis by regulating protein synthesis in response to internal or external stresses. In recent years, the ISR has emerged as an important regulator of the central nervous system (CNS) development, homeostasis and pathology. Dysregulation of ISR signaling has been linked to several neurodegenerative diseases. Intriguingly, while acute ISR provide neuroprotection through the activation of cell survival mechanisms, prolonged ISR can promote neurodegeneration through protein misfolding, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and dynamics of the ISR in neurodegenerative diseases aids in the development of effective therapies. Here, we will provide a timely review on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the ISR in neurodegenerative diseases. We will highlight the current knowledge on the dual role that ISR plays as a protective or disease worsening pathway and will discuss recent advances on the therapeutic approaches that have been developed to target ISR activity in neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular NeurodegenerationSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207